Become A Pro At Job Search By Job Hopping Every Three Years – This Change Is Actually Good For You

Become A Pro At Job Search By Job Hopping Every Three Years

Changing jobs every two years used to look terrible on a resume. Constant job search meant that you cannot stick to one job. It also meant that you cannot get along with coworkers, or that you were basically untrustworthy and cannot commit.

That stigma is quick becoming out of date—especially as millennials increase within the workplace with expectations to learn continuously, and advance in their careers. This is totally different than the idea of previous generations. In the past, you simply work for only one company throughout your lifetime hoping that your boss will treat you fairly when you retire with a 401k plan, among other incentives. Today, job search is inevitable.

Job Search Applicants

Workers who stay with a company for more than two years are believed to be paid 50% less

 

There are lots of arguments for switching jobs every few years. The economy isn’t the same as before—and will never be again. Workers who stay with a company for more than two years are believed to be paid 50% less, and job hoppers are assumed to have a better learning curve, be better performers, and could even be extra loyal. This is due to wanting to create a worthy impression within the short period of time spent with the company.

The former chief talent officer of Netflix (also in charge of the company’s current innovative work culture), says that job hopping is good, and young people should be doing this every three to four years.

It is assumed that the foremost necessary, essential modification in people’s mental outlook is to look at workers as clever contributors from the start. And if we altered our perception and said, ‘Everyone here wants to come to work, do an outstanding job, and contribute,’ then you can see if they are suitable for the position or not. You build skills quicker when changing jobs due to the better learning advantage.

Job hoppers are assumed to have a better learning advantage, be better performers, and could even be extra loyal

Why is there a better learning advantage? This is due to job hoppers being placed outside of their comfort zones constantly. They understand that they need to learn quickly, create good impressions, all within one or two years before moving on to their next conquest. As a result, they’re typically overachievers and pick up lots in a remarkably short period of time.

In reality life is more stable with frequent job changes. And in terms of managing your own career, if you don’t change jobs every three years, you do not develop the talents of obtaining employment quickly, therefore you do not have any career stability. You’re simply reliant on on the place that you work at as if it was 1950, and you will only get a gold watch at the finale of a 50-year term at your company.”

The learning curve pretty much levels after three years. When an employee stays at a job for too long, they get used to it and is not learning as much, thus become less engaged, and therefore their work is not as good. To stay engaged, most people should go through the constant job search process.

To companies, employee retention is a big concern since it is costly to train. However when your company is growing rapidly because of the high, job-hopping achievers it should not be a worry.

 

Leave a Reply